Anjin Media

Editorial control for marketing teams

Check the story against the source.
Then render the edit.

Before a recorded interview or webinar becomes a campaign asset, check which statements the edit uses and what surrounds them. Anjin exposes the proposed sequence as a readable cut plan your team can review and revise.

One video or an entire archive.

Reviewable cut plans product demonstration

How it worksSOURCE GROUNDED
01 / INPUT

A planned composition and the recordings selected for it.

02 / ANJIN

Review the chosen wording, source ranges, order and estimated duration.

03 / RESULT

A versioned cut plan to revise or use for a render.

What is an AI video cut plan?

An inspectable sequence of source moments before the finished video.

Segments carry source references and timecodes so you can return to the recording and check context. Rendering uses a specific plan version. This makes the edit inspectable; it does not verify the truth of a statement, confirm permission or replace watching the final video.

Controls and evidence

See what the system used and produced.

Useful automation leaves something a person can inspect. Anjin keeps the edit connected to its brief, source media and output settings.

REVIEWABLE CUT PLANSVERIFIABLE OUTPUT
source
Check each selected statement against its original recording and time range.
structure
Read the order and editorial roles; keep the context a viewer needs.
duration
Compare estimated length with your target before rendering.
version
Identify the exact plan version used for the output you review.

Why it matters

More control, less timeline work.

01

Check the campaign message

Does the sequence support the intended message without dropping caveats or making a speaker appear to say something different? Return to the source where context is unclear.

02

Give concrete edit notes

Ask to move supporting context earlier, remove repetition or change the opening. Inspect the revised plan before rendering; source material still limits what the edit can say.

03

Keep a human release check

Use the plan as an editorial checkpoint, then watch the finished video for pacing, framing, captions and sound. Keep your team’s existing approval process.

Fit and boundaries

Use the capability where it genuinely helps.

Anjin is strongest on speech-led recorded material where the editorial job can be described clearly and every selected moment needs to remain verifiable. It supports human judgement with searchable evidence, a reviewable plan and structured outputs.

A strong fit

Recorded knowledge with a story inside it

Interviews, podcasts, webinars, discussions and archive programmes benefit when the useful material is distributed across a long recording or several selected sessions.

Keep elsewhere

Final craft and image-led montage

Detailed colour, sound design, motion graphics and wordless visual storytelling remain finishing tasks for a professional editor and their preferred creative tools.

Evaluation checklist

What should you verify before adopting reviewable cut plans?

CHECK 01

source

Confirm that the workflow exposes this clearly: check each selected statement against its original recording and time range.

CHECK 02

structure

Confirm that the workflow exposes this clearly: read the order and editorial roles; keep the context a viewer needs.

CHECK 03

duration

Confirm that the workflow exposes this clearly: compare estimated length with your target before rendering.

CHECK 04

version

Confirm that the workflow exposes this clearly: identify the exact plan version used for the output you review.

Questions about reviewable cut plans

What is included in an Anjin cut plan?
A cut plan includes ordered segments, source references and timecodes, editorial reasoning and estimated duration. These let a reviewer check the proposed story against the recordings selected for the composition.
What should a marketing team check before rendering?
Check that the opening is supported by the recording, the sequence retains necessary context, the selected words support the campaign message and any claims are still current. Verify permission and speaker consent separately. Then compare the planned length with the target.
Does reviewing a plan use my allowance?
Planning and reviewing do not use any allowance; AI planning and revisions are included. Source minutes are counted once, when footage is ingested, and each rendered aspect uses export minutes.
Can I change the selected moments or their order?
Yes. Request a structural revision in plain language and inspect the updated plan version. Check that the new sequence resolves your note before rendering; revisions remain grounded in the selected footage.
Can I review framing as well as the story?
Yes. An optional visual-plan workflow lets you propose framing, read the proposal, run preflight checks and approve it for the cut before rendering. Editorial and visual plans have separate version records. This is an additional review step, not a requirement for every render.
Is reviewing the plan enough to approve a finished video?
No. A plan helps you inspect selection and structure. Watch the rendered output to check the actual pacing, crops, caption readability and sound before publishing. Source timecodes show where a statement came from; they do not prove it is true.
Can developers retrieve the plan?
Yes. Plans and their versions are available through the API and agent workflows. Teams can use these records alongside their existing review process.

Use reviewable cut plans in your next edit.

Start with footage you already have and a clear description of the result you need.

One video or an entire archive.